The latest news- straight to the point!

Notre Dame hammer attack investigated as terror; officer and suspect hurt

Suddenly, the French are realizing their decisions have consequences. Electing politicians that allow the invasion to continue will result in acts such as this.

Continue Reading
Categories: Eurozone, Immigration
Tags: ,
Share Options
0 Comments

FLASHBACK: Sadiq Khan Vigorously Defended Convicted Terrorists in 2002 (VIDEO)

A man who defended terrorists in the past is the current mayor of London.

Continue Reading
Share Options
0 Comments

Trump seizes on London attack to push domestic crackdown

London is not safe and Mayor Khan is doing nothing to help. President Trump is the only one with the guts enough to say it.

Also: “Trump misconstrued that statement, and went on to accuse Khan of making up a “pathetic excuse” for his remarks.”
Such fraudulent reporting…your statement is based upon the Mayor’s staff clarification, after the Trump tweet.

Continue Reading
Share Options
0 Comments

Paris Agreement on climate change: US withdraws as Trump calls it ‘unfair’

Goodbye to ‘American Last.’ The Paris agreement was basically an attempt to halt climate change on the honor system. Its only legal requirements were for signatories to announce goals and report progress, with no international enforcement mechanism. As a result, it was likely that the United States and wealthy European nations would have adopted and implemented severe climate change rules while many of the world’s governments would avoid doing anything that would slow their own economies. The agreement basically made the U.S. economy and Europe’s strongest economies sacrificial lambs to the cause of climate change.
Industrial Carnage. The regulations necessary to implement the Paris agreement would have cost the U.S. industrial sector 1.1 million jobs, according to a study commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. These job losses would center in cement, iron and steel, and petroleum refining. Industrial output would decline sharply.
Hollowing Out Michigan, Missouri, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. The industrial carnage would have been concentrated on four states, according to the Chamber of Commerce study. Michigan’s GDP would shrink by 0.8 percent and employment would contract by 74,000 jobs. Missouri’s GDP would shrink by 1 percent. Ohio’s GDP would contract 1.2 percent. Pennsylvania’s GDP would decline by 1.8 percent and the state would lose 140,000 jobs.
Smashing Small Businesses, Helping Big Business. Big businesses in America strongly backed the Paris climate deal. In fact, the backers of the climate deal reads like a “who’s who” of big American businesses: Apple, General Electric, Intel, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, General Mills, Walmart, DuPont, Unilever, and Johnson & Johnson. These business giants can more easily cope with costly regulations than their smaller competitors and many would, in fact, find business opportunities from the changes required. But smaller businesses and traditional start-ups would likely be hurt by the increased costs of compliance and rising energy costs.
Making America Poorer Again. A Heritage Foundation study found that the Paris agreement would have increased the electricity costs of an American family of four by between 13 percent and 20 percent annually. It forecast a loss of income of $20,000 by 2035. In other words, American families would be paying more while making less.
Much Poorer. The overall effect of the agreement would have been to reduce U.S. GDP by over $2.5 trillion and eliminate 400,000 jobs by 2035, according to Heritage’s study. This would exacerbate problems with government funding and deficits, make Social Security solvency more challenging, and increase reliance on government’s spending to support households.
The Paris deal was, in short, a disaster for America and a nothing-burger for climate.

Continue Reading
Share Options
0 Comments

Merkel urges EU to control their own destiny, after Trump visit, climate change decision

Trump told the EU that the free ride is over and that they needed to start contributing what they had agreed to toward NATO.

They also anticipate that the US will NOT be a party to their climate change taxation.

Continue Reading
Share Options
0 Comments